What Makes a Private Attorney Better Than a Public Attorney?

Many people are unaware of what the difference between a private criminal lawyer and a public defender is. The explanation is rather straightforward. A public defender is the legal representation that is provided to a person who is unable to afford one. The public defender is thus charged to protect the interests of the clients whilst being paid by the government. But before a public defender is awarded to the affected individual, an eligibility test is carried out involving an assessment of a person’s assets and income. Although public defenders come freely many people question the devotion and dedication that a client will get from such representation. Public defenders are very efficient criminal lawyers, as they handle many cases every day. Many have an area of specialty; in this area, they will be one of the most highly qualified attorneys around. For example, there are public defenders who work specifically as DUI lawyers. Additionally, many public defenders develop good rapport with judges. As a result, your representation by a public defender may be very effective. Of course, if you’ve got the cash to hire yourself legal representation, it’s recommended that you do so. Why? It’s thought that private attorneys will put in the hours needed to make a case strong. While you may need to talk with family and friends for help in retaining a private lawyer, studies show it’s the best investment you can make. Returns with these lawyers generally yield you a lesser charge and/or sentence. A better way to see the difference between being represented by a private lawyer and one provided by the government is to take a look at statistics that have been accumulated over the years. These results clearly show that amongst people being tried for similar crimes, the majority of those who were represented by public defenders ended up serving longer jail terms. For people who plan on pleading guilty and wish to receive a shorter or softer sentence, hiring a private attorney will provide a better guarantee of this. Public defenders in most jurisdictions have a case load several times that of private lawyers. Because public defenders may be overworked, they may simply not have the necessary time to devote to your case. If you go with the public defender, you may have little or no access to your lawyer except during the court hearings themselves because they simply don’t have the time to meet with you outside of these scheduled appearances. It’s been said that public defenders will press their clients into accepting plea bargains because it takes less time than going through a trial process. However, a private attorney will take on your case and devote his/her time to it, making sure you get the best outcome possible. They’ll research your case entirely, which is the biggest reason they have stronger defenses than public defenders. Of course, you’re paying for your attorney where the government is paying the public defender. Legal representation is extremely important if a person requires legal assistance or is being charged with a crime. For people who are unable to afford an attorney, seeking the counsel of a public defender creates a welcomed and effective idea. Such people will however be required to first qualify by passing a strict screening process. However, for those who are able to afford hiring a private attorney, resorting to this option will prove a far more effective choice.

Attorney Washington DC Accident Attorney and Vehicular Accidents

Is there a direct relationship between gas prices and the number of vehicular accidents on the road? Yes, there is. There has been a growing number of vehicular crashes, six million to be precise. The Unites Stated stretches to almost 3.79 million square miles with fifty states, naturally the number would be huge. But that does not rationalize the fact that with about $230 billion of financial expenditure and a single death in every 13 minutes anywhere around the country-we should all just take a seat and put up with the reports. A Washington DC accident attorney must have his or her hands chock-full each day, knowing that there are more accidents than individual hired per day. As the cost of fuel grows higher, more and more people are seeking for cheaper commute. For this reason the rising figures of motorbike riders. And also bike riders in the side lanes. Fatefully, the rate of motorbike accidents has increased also, numbering to almost 75,000 injuries and 4,000 deaths each year. We all have this preconception that they could be the error of the biker themselves. A lot of truck drivers might say yes that bikers tend to feel like they are the “king of the road.” Bikers may have injuries because of over speeding, drunk driving and or crash. Medics remark that one out of three lives could have been saved if they have worn a helmet. Although automobile and bus drivers out there should not feel secured, for any one of you also could experience same fate if you do not wear seatbelts. To preempt such situation to happen, it is forever expedient to be very cautious at all times. Knowing 115 individuals die every day must be one of our stimuli to be sober and be good followers of the traffic rules. Not the best motivation but it could give us a humbling example. If as an example should there be any accident the first thing probably to do is to instantaneously go to the insurance company and process for an insurance request. This is done in order to collect at once subsidy to pay for the hospital costs or (unluckily) interment of the victim. Although this is the most understandable thing to do, one may prepare oneself in the insurance service’s indecision to disburse financial assistance. Some individuals can claim indemnity after some years, or might have to experience a laborious court case before claiming the repayment. If you have been knowledgeable that the accident has been caused by some heedless person, e.g. drunk driver, thoughtless driver, and so on, you could have a strong lawsuit underway. Get hold of a Washington DC accident attorney from a trustworthy source. Every accident attorney specializes in certain cases. When you go to a law firm or check out the bar lists, find out every attorney’s handled cases, success rate and means of compensation. Several of Washington DC accident attorney are hired as per contingency fee basis. That is, your lawyer will not expect any pay unless he or she wins the lawsuit.

OSHA Approves Construction Restart after Southern Nevada Wrongful Death Accident at Lake Mead

Approximately two weeks after a freak catastrophic Southern Nevada wrongful death accident at the construction site of the third irrigation tunnel from Lake Mead to Las Vegas, the Silver State’s Occupational Safety & Health Admin. has allowed work to restart. To resume, the construction contractor presented safety plans, engineering documents and additional procedures to the Nevada worker protection agency. The Nevada water authority states that construction preparation will begin immediately with additional digging and drilling will restart within less than a week. One person suffered minor injuries, while another Thomas Turner, 44, was killed in the Southern Nevada wrongful death accident. If you are the relative of someone killed in a Southern Nevada wrongful death accident, contact Benson and Bingham for a free legal consultation today.

The accident happened when the support structure for the 20 foot tunnel loosened and high pressure gout and cement sprayed on Mr. Turner. He was killed instantly in the Southern Nevada wrongful death accident. After the accident, the remainder of the 12-person team working on that section of the tunnel was evacuated. Mr. Turner worked for the contractor who is working on the project, Vegas Tunnel Constructors.

While Thomas Turner was the first Southern Nevada wrongful death accident, he was not the first death at the worksite. In February 2010, Jose Chavez passed away from kidney disease, heart disease and diabetes while working at the construction site. While his death wasn’t due to an accident, the way the emergency was handled drew rebukes from Nevada’s OSHA watchdogs. On the day he died, Mr. Chavez had complained to supervisors of not feeling well, but since he was the only one available to operate certain machinery, he was convinced to return to work by his superiors. After completing his assigned task, Mr. Chavez was then taken by a co-worker to the work site’s first aid station. Once there, Mr. Chavez continued to get even sicker. The worksite’s safety manager then called the National Park Service for emergency rescue of Mr. Chavez, but in the confusion was not able to remember the address of the work site. The Safety Manager then loaded Mr. Chavez into his own personal vehicle and rushed him to the hospital. En route, Mr. Chavez passed out and was not able to be revived. He was pronounced dead at the hospital, three hours after his symptoms appeared. Southern Nevada wrongful death accidents come in many forms, so if someone you love was killed, and you suspect it was a wrongful death incident, please contact the personal injury attorneys at Benson and Bingham today.

Benson and Bingham is one of Las Vegas’ leading personal injury law firms, focusing on Southern Nevada wrongful death accidents, brain and spinal cord injuries and defective products. Our firm, founded in 2003, is a family business, founded and run by cousins Joseph Benson and Ben Bingham. Our success, as demonstrated by the $24,000,000 we secured for our clients in 2010 and 2011, comes from our relationships with our clients.

Child Custody In Nevada

Child custody is a legal term that describes the legal and practical relationship between a parent and his or her child. Custody involves not only the amount of time a parent physical spends with his or her child (referred to as physical custody), but also involves a parent’s role in the decision making process for his or her child (legal custody) such as education decisions, medical decisions and sometimes financial decisions.

If you are involved in a custody dispute in Nevada, the court will only consider the best interests of the child in making a custody determination. The Court may award custody in favor of one parent over another if the parent arguing for primary custody can present proof to the Court that custody should be changed in their favor and it is in the best interests of the child. In determining the best interest of the child, the court will consider, among other things:

·The wishes of the child if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to custody;

·Any nomination by a parent or a guardian for the child;

·Whether there is any conflict between the parents, and what level of conflict that might be;

·The parents’ ability to cooperate to meet their child’s needs;

·Any mental or physical health issues relating to the parents;

·The emotional, developmental, and physical needs of the child;

·The child’s relationship with each parent;

·The need for a child to maintain relationships with siblings;

·Any history of abuse or neglect for the child or one of his or her siblings;

·Whether either parent or any other person seeking custody has engaged in an act of domestic violence against the child, a parent of the child or any other person residing with the child.

A finding of domestic violence creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint custody of the child by the perpetrator of the domestic violence is not in the best interest of the child.

Most Nevada Courts will modify or terminate an existing custody arrangement if it is determined that the current arrangement is not in the best interests of the child.

Child Support in Nevada

Child support (or child maintenance) means the ongoing, periodic payment made by a parent for the benefit of a child following the end of a marriage or other relationship. Nevada law requires that the parents of a child provide the child necessary maintenance, health care, education and support. Who pays child support when a marriage or relationship ends depends in large part upon the custodial arrangement between the parents of the child. However, the laws of child support in Nevada apply regardless of gender, meaning that a mother has the same obligation of supporting her child as the father. The information provided in this article is offered to answer some of the most frequently questions about child support in Nevada.

How do I get Child Support?

In order to determine whether you are able to collect child support in your case depends upon the type of physical custody arrangement you have. Nevada presumes the parties will have joint physical custody, meaning parents share physical custody of their children. If the parties do not share custody, then the relationship is one where one parent has primary physical custody of the minor children, meaning the custodial parent has more time than the non-custodial parent. Whether the relationship is joint or primary, you may be able to collect child support from the other parent. For more information on how child support is calculated, see below.

How Is Child Support Calculated?

First, the parents’ gross monthly income must be determined. In Nevada, the Court requires each party prepare and file an Affidavit of Financial Condition. The affidavit is a financial statement which tells the Court the income, monthly obligations, debts, and assets of the Parties. Next, the Court will consider whether the parents have joint custody of their minor children or whether one parent has primary physical custody. In a situation where the parents have joint physical custody, the Court will consider each parent’s gross monthly income. Most people think joint custody means a 50/50 split. However, Nevada law provides that if one parent has the child at least 40% of the time, joint custody may apply. In a joint custody situation, the Court will compare the relative income of the parents. The parent having the higher gross monthly income, in most case, will be obligated to pay her proportionate share of child support.